Bacteriostatic Effect of Fresh Coconut Husk Smoke Residue on Inoculated Glass Slides Contaminated with Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus

Author's Information:

Judilla, Hannah Katrina

University of Cebu-Banilad, Gov. M. Cuenco Ave, Banilad, Cebu City, 6000 Cebu, Philippines

 Reboquio, Rodgen Daniel

University of Cebu-Banilad, Gov. M. Cuenco Ave, Banilad, Cebu City, 6000 Cebu, Philippines

 Arcilla, Emmanuelle Ionnie

University of Cebu-Banilad, Gov. M. Cuenco Ave, Banilad, Cebu City, 6000 Cebu, Philippines

Samonte, Arianne Grace

University of Cebu-Banilad, Gov. M. Cuenco Ave, Banilad, Cebu City, 6000 Cebu, Philippines

 Borbon, Albert Christian

University of Cebu-Banilad, Gov. M. Cuenco Ave, Banilad, Cebu City, 6000 Cebu, Philippines

De Lara, Sachi Xandria*

University of Cebu-Banilad, Gov. M. Cuenco Ave, Banilad, Cebu City, 6000 Cebu, Philippines

Vol 3 No 5 (2026):Volume 03 Issue 05 May 2026

Page No.: 189-196

Abstract:

The study determines the potential of coconut husk smoke residue as a passive bacteriostatic agent against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. This study utilized an experimental-comparative design to evaluate the antibacterial activityof smoke residueobtained from fresh, mature coconut husks. Microscope glass slides were exposed to the smoke residue and inoculated with bacterial suspensions, with comparisons made among treated,untreated, and positive control groups based on colony-forming unit (CFU/mL) counts.Due to non-normal data distribution, the Kruskal-Wallis H test and Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction were applied. Findings revealed a statistically significant reduction in CFU/mL of Staphylococcus aureus on treated surfaces(p = .002), indicating a bacteriostatic effect.However, no significant difference was observed for Escherichia coli (p= .982). Theseresults suggest that while coconut husk smoke residue exhibits antibacterial potential, its effectremains inconsistent and insufficient as a reliable alternative to conventional disinfection methods in practical applications. Further studies are recommended to standardize experimental conditions, improve detection methods, and identify the active compounds responsible for its antimicrobial activity and overall efficacyin different microbial environments tested. Additionally, future research may explore variations in exposure time, concentration of smoke residue, and environmental factors that could influence antibacterial performance and reproducibility of results

KeyWords:

Bacteriology, Bacteriostatic effect, fresh coconut husk, smoke residue, inoculated slides Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), Escherichia coli (E.coli).

References:

  1. Bolivar-Telleria, M., Turbay, C., Favarato, L., Carneiro, T., De Biasi, R. S., Fernandes, A. R., Santos, A. M. C., & Fernandes, P. M. B. (2018). Second-generation bioethanol from coconut husk. In BioMed Research International. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4916497.
  2. Kailaku, S., Syakir, M., Mulyawanti, I., & Syah, A. (2017). Antimicrobial activity of coconut shell liquid smoke. Institute of Physics Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering, 206, 012050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/206/1/012050.
  3. Wanjala, N.W., Matofari, J.W. & Nduko, J.M. (2016). Antimicrobial effect of smoking milk handling containers’ inner surfaces as a preservation method in pastoral systems in Kenya. Pastoralism 6, 17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13570-016-0064-y.
  4. Zuraida, I., Sukarno, S., & Budijanto, S. (2011). Antibacterial activity of coconut shell liquid smoke [CS-LS] and its application on fish ball preservation. International Food Research Journal. 18. 405-410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-nbt.2018.5183.
  5. Masfria, Syahputra, H., Wahyuni, H. S., Zebua, N. F., Elizabeth, & Marcelynn. (2024). Analysis of total flavonoid and antioxidant activity of coconut shell liquid smoke (Cocos nucifera L.) as an antibacterial. Pharmacy Education, 24(2), p. 39–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2024.242.3945.
  6. Aloysius, C., Varghese, A.A., Pattekkal Ali, S., Sukirtha, T.H., Aloysius Sabu, N., Cyriac, J. and Varghese, T. (2019). Antibacterial activity of carbon nanoparticles isolated from chimney soot. The Institution of Engineering and Technology Nanobiotechnology, 13: 316-319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-nbt.2018.5183.
  7. Almeida, T. M., Bispo, M. D., Cardoso, A. R., Migliorini, M. V., Schena, T., De Campos, M. C., Machado, M. E., López, J. A., Krause, L. C., & Caramão, E. B. (2013). Preliminary studies of bio-oil from fast pyrolysis of coconut fibers. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 61(28), 6812–6821. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf401379s.
  8. Lobiuc, A., Pavăl, N. E., Mangalagiu, I. I., Gheorghiță, R., Teliban, G. C., Amăriucăi-Mantu, D., & Stoleru, V. (2023). Future antimicrobials: natural and functionalized phenolics. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 28(3), 1114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031114.
  9. The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica (2025). Germ theory. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved on July 9, 2025 from https://bit.ly/3KpAdBt.
  10. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (n.d.). Circular economy introduction. Retrieved on December 12, 2025 from https://bit.ly/49jKOYl.
  11. Morelli, A. M., Ravera, S., Calzia, D., & Panfoli, I. (2019). An update of the chemiosmotic theory as suggested by possible proton currents inside the coupling membrane. Open biology, 9(4), 180221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.180221.
  12. Vestergaard, M., Bald, D., & Ingmer, H. (2022). Targeting the adenosine triphosphate synthase in bacterial and fungal pathogens: Beyond Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Journal of     Global    Antimicrobial       Resistance,            29,          29-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2022.01.026.
  13. Obeng, G. Y., Amoah, D. Y., Opoku, R., Sekyere, C. K., Adjei, E. A., & Mensah, E. (2020). Coconut wastes as bioresource for sustainable energy: Quantifying wastes, calorific values and emissions in Ghana. Energies, 13(9), 2178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13092178.
  14. Katara, G., Hemvani, N., Chitnis, S., Chitnis, V., & Chitnis, D.S. (2008). Surface disinfection by exposure to germicidal ultraviolet light. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology, 26(3): 241-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0255-0857.42034.
  15. Sivanesan, I., Muthu, M., Gopal, J., Tasneem, S., Kim, D. H., & Oh, J. W. (2021). A fumigation-based surface sterilization approach for plant tissue culture. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 2282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052282.
  16. Dalynn Biologicals. (n.d.). McFarland standard -in vitro use only. Retrieved on July 14, 2025 from https://bit.ly/3M6SiF8.
  17. Karah, N., Rafei, R., Elamin, W., Ghazy, A., Abbara, A., Hamze, M., & Uhlin, B. E. (2020). Guideline for urine culture and biochemical identification of bacterial urinary pathogens in low-resource settings. Diagnostics, 10(10), 832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10100832.
  18. Elbing, K. L., & Brent, R. (2018). Growth of E. coli on solid media. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, 125(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/cpmb.82.
  19. Educational Articles For Researchers, Students And Authors - Editage Blog. (2023). What is ANOVA (Analysis of Variance), types, assumptions and uses – A quick guide for biomedical researchers. Retrieved on July 24, 2025 from https://bit.ly/48q8icy.
  20. Olatunde, O.O., Benjakul, S., Vongkamjan, K., (2019) Coconut husk extract: antibacterial properties and its application for shelf-life extension of asian sea bass slices, International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 54(3), 810–822, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.14000
  21. Morshdy, A. E. M. A., Abdallah, K. M. E., Abdallah, H. E., Algahtani, F. D., Elabbasy, M. T., Atique, S., Ahmad, K., Al-Najjar, M. A. A., Abdallah, H. M., & Mahmoud, A. F. (2023). Potential of natural phenolic compounds as antimicrobial agents against multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in chicken meat. Molecules, 28(18), 6742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28186742